Hicks and the Murdoch press: a tale of vanity, stupidity, treachery and dishonesty

November 11, 2013 at 1:32 am (class collaboration, Guest post, labour party, Murdoch, strange situations, SWP, Tory scum, unions, Unite the union, workers)

By Anne Field

Another Sunday. Another issue of the Sunday Times. Another attack on Unite (on pages 1, 4, 16, 17 and 33).

But this time Jerry Hicks – the founder, leader and mouthpiece of the “Grass Roots Left” in Unite – has given a helping hand. According to the front-page article:

“Hicks said this weekend: ‘Was Falkirk an aberration or a modus operandi? There are serious questions that need to be answered about these tens of thousands of non-members of the union who were sent ballot papers.’”

The reference to “tens of thousands of non-members” receiving ballot papers relates to Hick’s complaint to the Certification Officer , alleging that in the Unite general secretary election held earlier this year 160,000 ballot papers were sent to former members not entitled to vote.

Unite’s response is that the members’ subscriptions had lapsed but they were still entitled to vote. Under rule 4.1 of the union’s rulebook members can be up to 26 weeks in arrears before being removed from the membership lists.

“Hicks says that it is not credible that nearly 160,000 members were in recent arrears of membership,” continues the Sunday Times article. But in a union with 1.4 million members it is entirely credible. Annual membership turnover in a union is 25%.

(See para. 9 of the recent government report: “Amendment to the TULRCA 1992: Trade Unions’ Registers of Members: Impact Assessment”.)

But the issue here is not – yet another – complaint by Hicks to the Certification Officer. It is his statement: “Was Falkirk an aberration or a modus operandi?”

The starting point for that statement can only be that Unite committed vote-rigging abuses in recruiting its members to the Labour Party in Falkirk. The sole question for Hicks is whether it was “an aberration or a modus operandi.”

This was no slip of the tongue by Hicks. In an earlier statement about Grangemouth Hicks wrote on his website of Unite’s “infantile, unfunny comic capers of infiltration through recruiting members to the Labour Party.”

Hicks’ line of argument is: Unite engaged in vote-rigging in Falkirk – isn’t it credible, therefore, that it engaged in the same malpractices in this year’s general secretary elections?

In fact, one of the comments on Hicks’ website is much more straightforward and makes explicit was Hicks merely insinuates:

“An investigation should have been launched to establish who in Unite cheated which resulted in McCluskey winning. Another investigation should be launched by the police into data protection issues over the use of Unite membership lists.”

(Clearly, one must assume that Hicks and his supporters were 100% supportive of Labour Party officials handing over the dodgy ‘Falkirk dossier’ to the police.)

Hicks is very proud of the Sunday Times coverage of his complaint to the Certification Officer. On his website he boasts:

“Jerry Hlcks (sic) challenge to validity of Unite General Secretary election makes ‘Sunday Times’ front page. The ‘Sunday Times’ (01/11/13) (sic) front page article ‘Union Boss Len McCluskey Elected by Phantoms’ carries my complaint to the Certification Officer.”

Hicks is either too thick or too callous, to be quite blunt about it, not to recognise that the Sunday Times front page article is nothing but another vicious witch-hunting attack on Unite, drawing parallels between supposed malpractices in Falkirk and supposed malpractices in Len McCluskey’s re-election.

It is also another disgraceful attack on Stevie Deans. The article makes a ‘linkage’ of Stevie-Deans-Unite-convenor (nearly lost everyone their jobs), Stevie-Deans-Falkirk-Labour–chair (vote-rigging) and Stevie-Deans-election-campaigner-for-McCluskey (vote-rigging).

Solidarity with his own union in the face of this witch-hunt? Solidarity with a fellow union member who has been hounded out of his job and his union and Labour Party positions?

Of such solidarity there is not a word in Hicks’ piece. Instead, narcissism trumps solidarity. “The media are responding to our (sic – should read: my) press release of 9th September,” claims Hicks.

No. The Sunday Times was not responding on 10th November to a press release issued by Hicks on 9th September. It was engaged in an ongoing witch-hunt.

And Hicks’ complaint to the Certification Officer, backed up by Hicks’ allegations about Unite’s role in Falkirk Labour Party, was just another ‘peg’ on which to hang the ongoing witch-hunt.

If there is hard evidence of vote-rigging in this year’s Unite general secretary elections, Hicks is perfectly entitled to raise it. Socialists would defend him for doing so, even if the right-wing media were to exploit such a complaint for its own ends.

But that is not the case here.

Hicks is endorsing gutter-level accusations about vote-rigging by Unite in Falkirk Labour Party in order to try to lend some credibility to allegations about vote-rigging in the Unite general secretary elections.

The Sunday Times picks up on these allegations. In three articles on five pages it attacks Unite and its links to the Labour Party. Hicks’ response is not to condemn the witch-hunt but to say: “Hey look, they’re talking about me!”

(Footnote: Hicks makes allegations about Unite’s recruitment practices in Falkirk Labour Party and about non-members of Unite being given a vote in the general secretary elections.

But according to Hicks’ website, the Grass Roots left national conference, held the day before the appearance of the Sunday Times article, was open to “members of Unite the union, their families and friends.”)

Ross Harper adds:

Well, just fancy that!

Enter Jerry Hicks, stage right, furiously backpedalling.

It’s all been a terrible mistake, he now claims in a new post on his website. See: http://www.jerryhicks4gs.org/

He has made no linkage, he says between events in Falkirk and his complaint to the Certification Officer. Good heavens, no!

And brother Hicks piously stresses that he is “opposed to any attempt to use my complaint in any witch hunt against my union.” Good to hear it, Jerry!

Mind you, there’s still a few things that Hicks needs to explain:

1) The article which he posted on his website this morning made NO criticism of the Sunday Times article. So why did he not say this morning what he is saying now? Could it be that he is saying it only now because of the flak he’s received, because of people ‘unfriending’ him, and because of the nasty things that have been written about him?

2) Hicks does not deny having said “Was Falkirk an aberration or a modus operandi?” This quote is, in any case, entirely consistent with what he has said elsewhere on his website about Falkirk, i.e. that Unite was engaged in “infiltration” of Falkirk Labour Party.

3) Hicks says that he has made no linkage between events in Falkirk and his complaint to the Certification Officer. Problem, for him, is that he claims that Unite was involved in “infiltration” in Falkirk (which the average person would consider to be vote-rigging) and that people who were not members of Unite received ballot papers during the general secretary election earlier this year, presumably in order to help Len McCluskey win (which the average person would consider to be vote-rigging). So it’s pretty pathetic for Hicks to claim that he is making no linkage between the two.

4) Hicks does not deny having said what the Sunday Times says that he said. Let us be charitable and suppose that the Sunday Times has run two different statements together from Hicks into a single quote. But what did Hicks think the Sunday Times was going to do? And this is someone who wants to be a union general secretary (where you need to know how to deal with the media)!

5) Hicks now writes: “I am opposed to any attempt to use my complaint in any witch hunt against my union.” But what about his allegation of “infiltration” into Falkirk Labour Party (and his rhetorical question about whether it was a one-off or established practice)? How can such allegations be used for anything other than a witch-hunt against Unite?

6) Even now Hicks cannot bring himself to utter a single word of support for Stevie Deans (although I very much doubt that Stevie would welcome support from such a source).

The next time Hicks throws his hat into the ring in another general secretary election, Unite members should remember this scurrilous fiasco.

12 Comments

  1. Hicks and the Murdoch press: a tale of vanity, stupidity, treachery and dishonesty | OzHouse said,

    […] Nov 11 2013 by admin […]

  2. Jim Denham said,

    Conservative Home notes, with glee, the Hicks intervention and, naturally seizes on the key quote:
    http://www.conservativehome.com/leftwatch/2013/11/now-len-mccluskey-faces-allegations-over-his-own-unite-leadership-election.html

  3. Andrew Coates said,

    The Socialist Workers Party was expelled from the United Left group for supporting Jerry Hicks.

    They hailed his “amazing” vote.

    They are strangely silent about this

    We wonder why.

  4. Jim Denham said,

  5. Ross Harper said,

    Hicks condemned McCluskey for calling a general secretary election in 2013.

    He wrote that it was “wrong to call a snap election to suit him (McCluskey) and Labour.” Instead, “all Unite’s time and resources” should have been used to “fight cuts and defend members”.

    Given that Hicks thinks that the 2013 general secretary election was a waste of time and resources, isn’t he being a bit inconsistent in trying to get it re-run (which is presumably what will happen if his complaint to the Certification Officer is upheld)?

    If the election is re-run, what are the odds on Hicks putting out a statement saying:

    “It’s wrong for an election to be re-run just to suit one man’s vanity (i.e. my own).”

    “All Unite’s time and resources should instead be used to fight cuts and defend members (such as those in Falkirk, currently under attack from myself, in alliance with the Murdoch press, the “Daily Mail” and “Conservative Home”).”

    PS: I also notice from today’s “Glasgow Herald” that the Falkirk witch-hunt has now been extended to target the Unite Scottish Region’s Political Officer, who is also chair of the Labour Party in Scotland.

    • jimmy glesga said,

      It is the Herald. Glasgow was removed dunkies ago.

    • John Stone said,

      The Election should be re-run because it was flawed.

  6. finbar said,

    Ok the commies did not get control of the Union but has it stopped capital and its attacks on the workers.and their jobs pay and conditions and a right to a job.

    Ok,Jerry, is well out back of the burner,but what collective actions are the Unions going to resolve to do to stop the ever relentless attacks on the waged and their struggle.

  7. Ian said,

    I did a simple google and found the following

    http://jerryhicks.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/%E2%80%98it%E2%80%99s-bulling-management-that-are-the-extremists%E2%80%99/

    Clearly Gerry has previous with the Murdoch press as he was a willing participant back in 2010.

  8. J V Stalin said,

    check check.

  9. John Stone said,

    I left the comment that investigations are needed internally to discover who in McCluskey’s campaign breached ballot rules. As was accepted by Electoral reform services and notified to the executive. The accusation that member’s names had been attached to letters headed with Unite’s Logo without their knowledge and therefore consent was discovered by supporters of Jerry Hicks but it was Chief of Staff Andy Murray that responded to me by e-mail that he believed that the breach was caused by Len McCluskey’s campaign team. Regardless of the result, regardless of whether sending ballot breaching letters out to retired member branches containing McCluskey’s propaganda on Unite headed paper. Why no investigation internally about WHO breached the rules in Len McCluskey’s name?
    I will finish with this, an honourable Man would want this matter put to bed so his reputation was not tarnished. If someone close to me did something that shamed me I’m sure I would want to know who and why. As for Unite, why have they allowed the use of it’s Logo to promote a candidate?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 461 other followers

%d bloggers like this: