Seymour: “In practical terms, we’re all reformists”
Well, who’d of thunk it, eh?
What a banal, pompous, pretentious, self-important mediocrity and shower of shite.
I suppose this means his career as a “commentator” in the Guardian will now be unencumbered by old-fashioned “revolutionary” baggage.
Lenin’s rolling over in his Tomb.
Shiraz Socialist 
Max said,
June 11, 2013 at 3:38 am
I suspect the point he was trying to make was that because the radical left is so weak at present, only reforms are possible – until a much more favourable set of circumstances arise. I also suspect he is right.
Eric said,
June 11, 2013 at 2:09 pm
Wait, I thought we’re all Hezbelloh now…. What a gasbag. Someone from the SWP talking about how we don’t have to “run everything” is hysterical on a thousand fronts.
Pete Smith said,
June 11, 2013 at 2:46 pm
So basically the ISN have decided that they aren’t interested in having political discussions with the AWL and this is your ‘political’ response, presumably Richard Seymour wouldn’t be subject to any of the descriptions used above if the ISN and AWL were engaged in political discussions ?
R F McCarthy (@RF_McCarthy) said,
June 12, 2013 at 1:10 am
yay…..