Tiananmen Square, 20 years on

June 3, 2009 at 9:01 pm (China, democracy, history, Human rights, Jim D, stalinism)

My partner, a reasonably intelligent and aware person, glanced at the picture (below) on the front of today’s Guardian G2 and exclaimed something like, “Christ! All those dead bodies! Was that Tiananmen Square? I never remember that it all ended in a bloodbath.”

Bodies of dead civilians lie among mangled bicycles near Beijing's Tiananmen Square, 4 June 1989

She has a point: maybe it’s because sections of the left still retain some residual loyalty to the so-called People’s Republic and/or just aren’t that bothered about massacres not carried out by the “west” or Israel; maybe it’s because the ruling class of the “west” don’t want to embarrass their trading partners, the Chinese ruling class; maybe it’s because the Chinese ruling class has done such an effective job of erasing the events of 20 years ago from history…

For whatever reason, a lot of people have sort-of forgotten that thousands of unarmed pro-democracy protesters died in a bloody massacre on 4 June 1989.

We must not, ever, forget.

From 1989 to 2009: 20 Years of Evolution in Chinese Thought (conference paper for “2009, Beijing, and the June Fourth Democracy Movement.”)

The events of , 1989 shocked China and the world. It was a watershed within Chinese history and politics, as well as a watershed for thought. did not change the Chinese political system, but it changed the basic conditions for thought, and it was a foundational starting point for changing the political system.

Advocating “people’s democratic dictatorship,” China’s political system have already been comprehensively exposed as anti-citizen, anti-humanity and fundamentally out of sync with human civilization. This is evident in the so-called “land reform” and “anti-counterrevolutionary movement” of the 1950s; the anti-rightist movement, the Great Leap Forward, and the commune movement. It reached its peak in the Cultural Revolution. But the Chinese people are a people accustomed to suffering through authoritarianism and hardship. On top of that, the regime in charge has created a seamless trap of fantastic ideology. Over the years, with the exception of those with foresight such as , few have reflected critically on the level of system and understood the necessity for a fundamental change. The incident (at Tiananmen Square) caused the situation to change. The knives, bullets and spilled blood cultivated a tragedy that awakened and educated the people to much more effect than any Enlightenment movement, a hundred Enlightenment thinkers or ten thousand Enlightenment books.

» Read more

6 Comments

  1. Hal said,

    The photo is shocking. The facts too. I confess I was prejudiced against the students at the time — “They’re just a bunch of irresponsible adventurists who’ll ruin everything.” I remember minimizing the deaths in discussions and feeling that the CP officials had had their hands forced. I deeply regret that attitude.

    Zhao Ziyang’s book is also an eye-opener.

    Wang Dan, one of the student leaders at the time, has some comments:

  2. david brough said,

    “of the left still retain some residual loyalty to the so-called People’s Republic and/or just aren’t that bothered about massacres not carried out by the “west” or Israel”

    http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/issues/C136/

  3. Euripides Trousers said,

    Does anyone still think of Spiked as on the left?

  4. Hal said,

  5. Jim Denham said,

    From Hak Mao:
    My then colleague the Beijing correspondent, hung a microphone out the window of his hotel room, and lay on the floor shaking and sobbing as the tanks ground over the bodies of students and workers outside. This article from the ICFI more or less says everything that needs to be said:

    Today marks the 20th anniversary of the Stalinist Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s military repression of the working class in Beijing. While the international media continues to portray the Tiananmen Square massacre as aimed at student protestors, the heavily-armed troops were in fact targetting an emerging nationwide revolutionary movement of urban workers.

    The official toll of just 241 deaths, including soldiers, is not credible. The regime at first denied any civilians had been killed. The Chinese Red Cross reported 2,600 dead, but withdrew the figure under government pressure. Independent analysts estimate that up to 7,000 people died, although the actual toll may never be known.

    Ignited by student protests for democratic reform in April, the mass movement rapidly spiralled out of official control as the working class raised its own social demands. At least 100 million people in 400 cities participated in protests and demonstrations of one form or another. Along with industrial workers and the urban poor, low-ranking officials, clerks, teachers and even police were involved, driven by their hatred for the social inequality and bureaucratic profiteering that followed Deng Xiaoping’s embrace of the capitalist market in 1978.

    Over the past 20 years, various Western politicians and media pundits have continued to issue hypocritical statements denouncing the “communist” regime’s suppression of “democracy” — all based on the false identification of Stalinism with socialism.

    The Maoist regime established in 1949 was never socialist or communist. Its anti-proletarian character was revealed yet again in 1989, when the CCP’s peasant-based army drowned the workers’ movement in blood. The massacre established the conditions for the Chinese working class to be integrated into the circuit of global capitalist production as super-exploited cheap labour.

    Beijing’s own claims to have suppressed a “counter-revolutionary rebellion” are no less false. The shooting of poorly-armed Beijing workers, who used their bodies to resist 40,000 troops armed with AK-47 rifles, tanks and helicopter gunships, was a gigantic advertisement to the Western powers that the Stalinist police-military apparatus would guarantee their investments from any challenge by the working class.

    The world’s major corporations responded to the massacre with a flood of capital that transformed China into the cheap labour “workshop of the world”.

    There’s more here: http://drinksoakedtrotsforwar.com/2009/06/04/gates-of-heavenly-peace/

  6. History is Made at Night said,

Leave a comment