Immigration: Corbyn’s principled stance shames Socialist Party

October 14, 2016 at 1:16 pm (Anti-Racism, capitulation, Europe, Human rights, immigration, internationalism, posted by JD, reformism, Socialist Party)

Image may contain: 1 person , text

This article first appeared in Solidarity and on the Workers Liberty website

One of the best bits of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour conference speech was his defence of migrants.

“It isn’t migrants that drive down wages; it’s exploitative employers and the politicians who deregulate the labour market and rip up trade union rights.

“It isn’t migrants who put a strain on our NHS; it only keeps going because of the migrant nurses and doctors who come here filling the gaps left by politicians who have failed to invest in training.

“It isn’t migrants that have caused a housing crisis; it’s a Tory government that has failed to build homes.

“Immigration can certainly put extra pressure on services… What did the Tories do? They… demonise migrants for putting pressure on services…

“We will act decisively to end the undercutting of workers’ pay and conditions through the exploitation of migrant labour and agency working… And we will ease the pressure on hard-pressed public services – services that are struggling to absorb Tory austerity cuts, in communities absorbing new populations”.

Socialist Party of England and Wales logo.gif

It should put to shame the Socialist Party, which has presented immigration controls as a sort of working-class “closed shop”, thus feeding the myth that migrant workers, and not the exploitation of migrant workers, drive down wages:

“The socialist and trade union movement from its earliest days”, declares the SP, “has never supported the ‘free movement of goods, services and capital’ – or labour – as a point of principle but instead has always striven for the greatest possible degree of workers’ control, the highest form of which, of course, would be a democratic socialist society with a planned economy.

“It is why, for example, the unions have historically fought for the closed shop, whereby only union members can be employed in a particular workplace, a very concrete form of ‘border control’ not supported by the capitalists”.

Were those sentences a bit of bad writing? An aberration? Not at all. The SP has opposed free movement of labour consistently, in many articles, for instance this one by their leader, Peter Taafe, that contains the following:

“The alleged benefits of the ‘free movement of labour’ are in reality a device for the bosses to exploit a vast pool of cheap labour, which can then be used to cut overall wage levels and living standards”.

“The EU’s free movement of labour rules… have helped the bosses to inflict a ‘race to the bottom’ in wages and conditions, rather than stemming from workers’ interests and a raising of living standards across the board”.

Even conventional academic research has shown that any depression of wage levels which follows increased immigration at a time of diminished trade union rights and inadequate solidarity is confined to particular categories of labour, and is much smaller than the wage gain which would result from stronger union rights and greater workers’ unity.

6 Comments

  1. Glasgow Working Class said,

    Seems tae me that according tae some so called socialists and liberals that the little island called Britain should take in millions of people from fascist islamic states and other states that negate personal resposibility tae their people to the extent that we have no land to feed our people.

    • Makhno said,

      It may “saem thit wae tae ye”, or whatever, but that makes you an idiot. Couching it it in folksy phonetics doesn’t make you any less of a bigot.

      • Glasgow Working Class said,

        Your childish comment does not address the fact that regimes all over the world off load their people to Britain and the regimes carry on as normal while our population in a small landmass explodes. Whatever happened to revolution and struggle.

      • Makhno said,

        That’s not really a “fact”, now is it? It’s more just your own personal bigotted brainsplurge.

        What happened to revolution and struggle? Well, partly it looks like people got sidetracked by petty-minded racism and xenophobia.

        Are you advocating a “revolution and struggle” against half-starved child refugees?

        Yer ‘ard.

  2. John Rogan said,

    “It is why, for example, the unions have historically fought for the closed shop, whereby only union members can be employed in a particular workplace, a very concrete form of ‘border control’ not supported by the capitalists.

    The alleged benefits of the ‘free movement of labour’ are in reality a device for the bosses to exploit a vast pool of cheap labour, which can then be used to cut overall wage levels and living standards”. – Socialist Party.

    The SP better be careful as this type of argument is not new and can lead to very dangerous conclusions.

    I recently read an obituary of Syd Bidwell who was a Labour MP and had been a Trotskyist. Included in the article was the following –

    If the SP (and others) start to argue that immigration controls for the defence of “British jobs” are a form of “closed shop”, then, after Brexit, the logical conclusion would be that this “closed shop” should be strengthened. Namely, EU residents and other immigrants should go back home and let British workers have the British jobs.

    By the way, I’m not in favour of unrestricted immigration myself to be honest but where borders have come down (as in the EU), it should bee seen as a progressive development and should be supported and defended.

    http://www.revolutionaryhistory.co.uk/index.php/178-articles/articles-of-rh0701/8501-adrift-in-the-rapids-of-racism

    • Jim Denham said,

      Thanks for drawing attention to that article, John: very interesting and important.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: