Get rid of all faith schools
The editorial in today’s Independent:
Free Schools should not be able to recruit on faith alone
A working definition of the phrase “the worst of all worlds” in education would be a faith-based free school, which, whatever its merits, is “free” to divide children and communities on fairly broad grounds. Such institutions do already exist, but their governing bodies are prevented from recruiting more than half of the intake on the grounds of religious affiliation, itself a notion that sends a shiver down the liberal spine. Now, there is agitation for that quota restriction to be lifted.
The reality of many faith schools, free or not, is that they are an exercise in parental deception. Previously Godless parents suddenly develop an interest in the Pope’s moral guidance or turn up to hear the vicar’s homilies on a Sunday morning.
For those parents unwilling to go through such charades, or who cannot afford to move to a prime catchment area, their children have to take whatever the local authority gives them.
Call to lift limits on faith selection by free schools
With our continued subsidies to private schools with only a flimsy claim to “charitable” status, we have now created a patchwork of schooling in Britain in which money and religious belief (real or feigned) are the main determinants of educational success, which is itself linked to success in later life. None should be very surprised that social mobility is becoming a concept we will have to teach in history lessons. This situation is unfair and profoundly inefficient for the economy, and there is no cause to make matters worse by distorting education even further.
Even without the help of the odd religious extremist, if children of all faiths think it natural to go to schools separately, we should not be surprised if they feel they have less in common with their fellow citizens as they grow older. Faith schools, even with a 50 per cent quota for diversity, and even with some excellent teaching, have their drawbacks.
______________________________________________________________________
Excellent comment, except for the words “have their drawbacks” substitute “should be abolished”.
Glasgow Working Class said,
December 29, 2015 at 1:56 am
Free schools are for adults that want their childen to follow on in their image. It is criminal that the taxpayer has to pay for this parental indulgence. Religion should not be subsidised by the taxpayer.
Political Tourist said,
December 29, 2015 at 3:48 am
Ah blame the schools.
Ben said,
December 30, 2015 at 4:42 am
The parents of children attending Free schools are taxpayers too. They are entitled to the benefits of Government spending just like everybody else.
Glasgow Working Class said,
December 30, 2015 at 11:27 pm
Does that include religion? I thought that was a private matter and not for taxpayer subsidies!!
februarycallendar said,
December 29, 2015 at 1:58 am
Couldn’t agree more. (I find the Independent flimsy and insubstantial but at least it is closer to my views on this matter than the Graun, I think.)
Recently my views on this matter were challenged by an ostensible “Leftist” on YouTube – almost certainly, I fear, the sort who would regard a minor level of provincial Anglican pettiness as worse than the worst Islamism.
Steven Johnston said,
December 29, 2015 at 2:04 pm
I know what you mean feb, actually murdering apostates is conveniently ignored by those leftists but if an Anglican were to suggest say a £50 fine for those leaving the Anglican faith he would become a hate figure for the left.
mark taha said,
December 29, 2015 at 11:47 am
Make all public funding conditional on their adopting a nonsectarian admissions policy-admit whoever lives nearest and no one from more than five miles away. The alternative would be to go private-without charity status and with 20% VAT on fees.