Hancock revisited

November 7, 2014 at 4:10 pm (BBC, comedy, Jim D, Sheer joy, wireless)

Image for The Missing Hancocks

Above: Hancock (left); McNally (right)

Above: the TV version

Radio 4’s  The Missing Hancocks which commemorates the sixtieth anniversary of  Hancock’s Half Hour, is a treat for listeners of my generation, who can just about remember the originals. For those who don’t know, the radio show ran for 103 episodes between 1954 and 1959 on the Light Programme and at its height was a national institution. The TV version ran from 1956 to 1961. Twenty of the radio shows have been “lost” (actually, wiped by the BBC in order to re-use the tapes) but the original scripts by Ray Galton and Alan Simpson were rediscovered by the actor Neil Pearson and five (chosen by Galton and Simpson themselves) have now been re-recorded in front of a live audience at the BBC Radio Theatre.

It’s become something of a cliché to describe Hancock’s Half Hour as the first modern sitcom, but that description is probably deserved: it was certainly the first British comedy show to revolve around the characters and to dispense with catch-phrases, set-piece sketches and variety acts. And, on the whole, the shows still work today, largely thanks to Galton and Simpson’s brilliant scripts in which Charles Dickens meets Harold Pinter.

The recreations are superb and Kevin McNally does more than simply impersonate Hancock’s intonation and phrasing – he manages to convey all the pent-up frustration, self-righteousness and delusions of grandeur that constituted the Hancock persona. The rest of the cast are nearly as good, though the chap who plays Sid James doesn’t have quite the right voice.

In my humble opinion, this stuff stands up far better than most supposedly “classic” comedy, including shows of twenty or thirty years later, like the grossly over-rated Monty Python’s Flying Circus and the abysmal Only Fools And Horses, the enduring popularity of which remains the source of complete bewilderment to me.

Of course, it’s difficult to listen to these recreations without remembering the real-life Hancock’s sad decline and tragic end. And the scripts make a fascinating comparison with the show Galton and Simpson went on to write after Hancock effectively sacked them – Steptoe And Son.

This isn’t just nostalgia or show-biz archaeology – it’s genuinely “classic” comedy that still works.

The series began last week with The Matadore and continues this week with The Newspaper  


  1. Ross said,

    Thanks for that …. an interesting exercise. I relish saying that I’m a bit too young to recall the radio shows ( I imagine they were played in Australia on the ABC ) but I do remember the TV version; very nostalgic.

    We’ll have to differ re Python. I thought the recent live reunion show stacked up pretty well.


    • Jim Denham said,

      I must admit to a bit of deliberate stirring with my comment about Python. I haven’t seen the live reunions, but (IMHO) re-runs of the original TV shows have not worn well. No doubt that it was highly influential, of course.

      My comments about Only Fools And Horses were 100% sincere, btw.

      Some other views on all this, from a recent article in the Graun:

      I accept, of course, that humour is a very subjective matter.

      • Rosie said,

        Agree about Only Fools and Horses. Sentimental trash. Hancock casts a cold eye on the self-deluded hero. More Gissing than Dickens in being uncompromising.

        Disagree about Python, which has some brilliant sketches. Also the graphics are great – I never appreciated how good they are until watching re-runs

        The Goodies has worn better I think.

  2. mark taha said,

    That photo shows Raymond Huntley.surely?

    • Jim Denham said,

      You are absolutely correct, Mark: the trouble is that Youtube doesn’t always give you the image you want.

      I thought this Youtube clip was a particularly good example of Hancock and Sid James at their best, wiith a great Galton and Simpson script.

      The fact that when I posted the Youtube clip, it showed Raymond Huntley and not Hancock, was something I thought readers would understand.

      Btw: a review of Huntley’s distinguished career can be found here:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: