75 years on: Irish ambassador’s “disgraceful” report on Kristallnacht exposed
Above: the wreckage of a Jewish shop in Berlin, the day after Kristallnacht
From the Irish Times:
It took a month – and a pointed request from Dublin – for our man in Berlin to file a report on Kristallnacht, November 9th, 1938.
Now a Berlin synagogue destroyed 75 years ago in the so-called “Night of Broken Glass” is exhibiting Charles Bewley’s “disgraceful and unfathomable” report.
The 13-page document, condemning the “undesirables in the Jewish race”, is notorious in Irish diplomatic and academic circles. But a German curator expects it to cause “astonishment” when it goes on display for the first time on Monday in Berlin.
“That a diplomat let fly like this is singular, I’ve never seen anything like it and I’ve read a lot of reports,” said Dr Christian Dirks, curator of the exhibition of diplomatic dispatches on the 1938 pogrom.
After years of official harassment of Jews in Nazi Germany, the state-sanctioned violence against Jews, their businesses, homes and places of worship on November 9th-10th, 1938, is seen as the start of the rapid road downhill to the Holocaust.
The Nazis dubbed it a “spontaneous expression of outrage” at the murder of Ernst vom Rath, a German diplomat in Paris, by Herschel Grynszpan, a German-born Jewish refugee of Polish parents. But many of the 100 diplomats cited in the exhibition noted that Germans were ashamed of this flimsy attempt to cover up high-level Nazi involvement.
The Bulgarian embassy wrote that it seemed “nothing will be able to stop a permanent solution to the ‘Jewish question’”.
Even Italy, a future Axis ally of Nazi Germany, was shocked by events, writing that it was “simply not imaginable that, one day, 500,000 people will be put up against a wall, condemned to suicide or locked up in huge concentration camps”.
Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels noted in his diary on November 11th: “We’ll wait for the reactions abroad. For now there’s still silence, but the uproar will come.”
There was much uproar, just not from Bewley. In sober language he describes the growing exclusion of Jews from German public life and describes the events of November 9th as “obviously organised”.
But his report, which begins in the tone of a dispassionate diplomatic observer, soon identifies with claims in Germany of the time that Jews dominated the worlds of finance and entertainment and used their influence to instil what he calls “anti-Christian, anti-patriotic and communistic” thinking.
He says their corrupting moral influence – promoting abortion, controlling the white slave trade – helps explain the “elimination of the Jewish element from public life”.
“Of all the diplomatic reports this one is usually demagogic and nasty,” said Dr Hermann Simon, director of Berlin’s Centrum Judaicum. “He really left no cliche out.”
In the report’s last section, Mr Bewley takes issue with the Irish media for following the pro-Jewish line of the “British press, itself in Jewish hands”, and “Anglo-Jewish telegraph agencies” by displaying prominently news of oppression against Jews but suppressing news of crimes perpetrated by Jews and anti-fascists.
In his conclusion he holds back from advising Dublin on how to correct what he believes is Ireland’s one-sided view of what he calls the “Jewish problem”, while leaving little doubt that he views Jews themselves as the key issue.
The anti-Semitic virulence in Bewley’s report is “unique” among the diplomatic dispatches, according to curator Christian Dirks.
“The report bowled us over,” he said. “It proffers an educated anti-Semitism which doesn’t just blame the Jews for everything but provides alleged reasons for anti-Jewish feeling. In many passages it recalls arguments you hear today from neo-far right thinkers like David Irving. ”
As well as quotes from the Bewley report in translation, the exhibition details his appointment to Ireland’s mission to Berlin in September 1933, his recall in summer of 1939 and subsequent departure from the diplomatic service. He settled in Rome and died there in 1969.
johannah1177 said,
November 9, 2013 at 10:33 pm
Reblogged this on maybe1177 and commented:
Read this today and was truly appalled.
jimmy glesga said,
November 11, 2013 at 11:30 pm
All those dictators are Papists and Jew haters. Covering up the bum boy pedo pervert priests.
Donald Williams said,
December 18, 2013 at 3:15 am
Charles Bewley was just reporting back what he believed to be true so the question remains WHY wasn’t his report condemned 75 years ago ? Maybe because the US and Australian press corp said much the same. There are numerous reports available to read by independent observers of the day who back up Charles Bewley’s claims so why are people howling today 75 years after the fact ? It is an undeniable fact that the Bolsheviks were fomenting War during that period and they starved to death more than 10.000.000 Ukrainians but nobody is howling about that and those Bolsheviks were not Russian as you had Lazar Kaganovich and Gingrich Yogada murdering Millions and the Duma list reports their nationality as Hebrews yet even though the Reds slaughtered Millions their crimes are considered as not a crime at all and to me that sounds like a double standard much like when Yogada’s NKVD slaughtered 25.000 Polish officers in Poland in 1939 and the British and US allied themselves with the Reds who were committing most of the atrocities and they knew about Katyn but said nothing and in 1943 blamed that atrocity on the Germans. It escapes peoples memory that the Bolsheviks Crucified Priests in Russia and Spain and destroyed thousands of Churches but it appears that the Christians are ignoring the crimes committed against their own kind like they are ignoring the crimes committed against Christians today in Syria and Egypt. It is a sick world we live in.