60 years on: let’s honour the ‘Windrush generation’

June 22, 2008 at 3:08 pm (Anti-Racism, history, Human rights, immigration, Jim D)

60 years ago today, the Empire Windrush docked at Tilbury, bringing 492 men from Jamaica and Trinidad to what they thought of as the “mother land”.

These were not, of course, the first black people in Britain. According to Gretchen Gerzina’s ‘Black England – Life before Emancipation’, “most historians  give 1555, when five Africans arrived to learn English and thereby facilitate trade, as the beginning of a continual black presence in Britain. By 1596 there were so many black people in England that Queen Elizabeth issued an edict demanding that they leave.”

What’s significant about the ‘Windrush generation’ is that their arrival marked the beginning of what has become known as “multicultural Britain” (and I have no intention of going into the various arguments about the precise definition of “multiculturalism” here): the idea that non-white people from the old Empire have a right to come to Britain and to be treated as equal citizens, whilst retaining aspects of their previous cultures.

Many of the Windrush arrivals were servicemen who’d fought for Britain in the second world war. A lot of them intended to rejoin the RAF , and few intended to stay more than a few years.

The Guardian‘s ‘Special Correspondant’: reported at the time:

 “And what made them leave Jamaica? In most cases, lack of work. They spoke independently, but unanimously, of a blight that has come upon the West Indies since those who served America and Britain during the war returned home. The cost of living is high, wages are low. Many can earn no wages. Some have been unemployed foe two years. One of them considered his chances in Britain (he was a builder), and said laconically, ‘If I survive, good; if I don’t survive – so good.’ Another, lacking his philosophy, said with a bitterness unusual in the company, ‘When the situation is desperate you take a chance – you don’t wait until you die.'”  

There was plenty of work for the new arrivals (Britain was in the grip of a labour shortage), though almost always the most menial jobs, usually well below their skills and qualifications. They found work in local authorities (refuse collection, etc), the NHS and London Transport. But accomodation was short and this caused conflict as racists stirred up trouble in the areas where the new arrivals settled, especially Brixton and Notting Hill. They found colour bars in clubs, pubs (“No Blacks, No Dogs, No Irish”) and housing. Racist attacks became more common, culminating in the 1958 Notting Hill riots instigated by organised racist gangs. The Immigration Act of April 1962 began the current process of formal racism – the laws which discriminate against black immigrants, barring almost all immigrants from Africa, the Caribbean and the Indian subcontinent, except those joining close family here.

But let’s for now, remember those Windrush arrivals sixty years ago. They were not all heroes or even particularly admirable people. They were just human beings like the rest of us, trying to do the best for themselves and their families. The Guardian‘s man got it about right:

“They are, then, as heterodox a collection of humanity as one might find. Some will be good workers, some bad. Many are ‘serious minded persons’ anxious to succeed. No doubt the folk poets will find fit audiences somewhere. So will the complete dance-band which is journeying to Liverpool at this moment. And the boxer, who is going to meet his manager at Birkenhead, will surely find fights in plenty. Not all intend to settle in Britain; a 40-year-old tailor, for example, hopes to stay here for a year, and then go on and make his home in Liberia.

“Their arrival has added to the worries of Mr. Isaacs and the trade union leaders. But the more worldly-wise among them are conscious of the deeper problem posed. Britain has welcomed displaced persons and has given employment to Poles who cannot go home. ‘This is right,’ said one of the immigrants. ‘Surely then, there is nothing against our coming, for we are British subjects. If there is -is it because we are coloured?”

And just to jolly things up, here’s some calypso from ‘Lord Kitchener’, who was (I believe) on the Windrush:

Acknowledgements: Jeni Bailey (Youth Fightback/Socialist Organiser pamphlet ‘How To Beat The Racists’, 1993), and the late Peter Fryer (‘Staying Power’ , Pluto Press, 1984).




  1. Dave Flint said,

    Mass immigration into the U.K. began in 1957 when Mc.Millan took over from Anthony Eden after the Suez Crisis. Before 1957 I saw only one black man. Mass immigration did not begin with the Windrush. IN ADDITION most white Christian Britisjh people either voted Conservative or did not vote at all, which means that the presence of immigran t communities has a caste iron legitimacy, the reason why YOU are hear is because the majority of white British people wanted you to be here, if they did not they would have voted Labour.

  2. realhackney said,

    Let me correct you on a couple of things (my dad was one of the passengers), Lord Kitchener wasn’t on the Windrush but he was used in the British governments advertising campaign to fool people from the commonwealth countries into coming here. The ad went something like: A taxi driver earns £5 a week here (in the uk), Just think what YOU could be earning with a picture of Kitchener pointing his imperial finger.
    My dad, who was living the life of Riley as a detective sergeant in the Jamaican Police force, knew something was wrong when they put him down as a clerk on the passenger list (as if they already knew he would have no hope of getting the same job here).
    After a gruelling voyage, they were held up for several days within sight of the white cliffs of Dover whilst the conservatives challenged the decision to let them come here. My dad says that at least 4 men jumped overboard and swam for it, such was the frustration. Giving up his well paid job and finding that he was only required to do cleaning or menial work, sent him mad as he could not afford to go back. He took his madness and grief out on me and my brothers and we all ended up in a childrens home full of peodophiles. When I read some bullxxxx on the Windrush saying that the british government KINDLY invited people from the commonwealth here to better their lives it makes me sick to the teeth. As the majority of them didn’t

    • Steve Lane said,

      I should correct my typo – “the white cliffs of Dover” with Southhampton where it docked.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: