Darfur and slavery

March 24, 2007 at 6:59 pm (Jim D)

Today’s  Independent (UK daily newspaper) publishes an open letter from some intellectuals on the fiftieth anniversary of the founding of the European Union (as it now calls itself). For once, Harold Pinter puts his name to something worthwhile:

“To the leaders of the 27 nations of the EU,

How dare we Europeans celebrate  this weekend while on a continent some few miles south of us the most defenceless, dispossessed and weak are murdered in Sudan?

“Has the European Union – born of atrocity to unite against further atrocity – no word to utter, no principle to act , no action to take, in order to prevent these massacres in Darfur? Is the cowardliness over Srebrenica to be repeated? If so, what do we celebrate?

“The thin skin of our political join?

“The futile posturings of our political class?

“The impotent nullities of our bureaucracies?

“The Europe which allowed Auschwitz and failed in Bosnia must not tolerate the murder in Darfur: Europe is more than a network of the political classes, more than a first world economic club and a bureaucratic excrescence. It is an inherited culture which sustains our shared belief in the value and dignity of the human being. In the name of that common culture and those shared values, we call upon the 27 leaders to impose immediately the most stringent sanctions upon the leaders of the Sudanese regime.

“Forbid them from our shores, our health service and our luxury goods. Freeze their assets in our banks and move immediately to involve other concerned countries.

“We must not once again betray our European civilisation by watching and waiting while another civilisation in Africa is destroyed.

“Let this action be our our gift to ourselves and proof of ourselves. And when it is done let us celebrate together with pride”.

Signed by: Umberto Eco, Dario Fo, Gunter Grass, Jurgen Habermas, Vaclav Havel, Seamus  Heaney, Bernard Henri-Levy, Harold Pinter, Franca Rame, Tom Stoppard.

The letter was timed to co-incide with the fiftieth anniversary of the creation of what is now the European Union: but it could as well have been timed to co-incide with the commemorations presently taking place in Britain to mark the “abolition” of the slave trade in 1807 (although, in fact, British-held slaves in the Caribbean and Mauritius were not emancipated until 1833).

The present-day international scandal of Darfur harks back to the barbarity and genocide of the  17th, 18th and 19th Century slave trade, because the present-day, Islamist government of Sudan is amongst the most blatent and shameless promoters of slavery in the world today. Some 8,000 people are presently believed to be living in slavery in Sudan.

Irshad Manji, in her 2004 book The Trouble With Islam, writes:

“Put simply, is Islam’s scripture also vague or conflicted about other human rights issues, such as slavery? If so, do twenty-first-century Muslims have the room to make twenty-first-century choices? I thought of Sudan and later read about the extent of its slave trade. In Khartoum, a ‘Taliban-like Muslim regime is waging a self-declared jihad’ on Christians, Animists and non-Arab Muslims. That’s according to Charles  Jacobs, president of the American Anti-Slavery Group and director of the Sudan Campaign. Jacobs observes that ‘Khartoum’s onslought has rekindled the trade in black slaves, halted (mostly) a century ago by the British abolitionists…(A)fter the men are slaughtered, the women, girls, and boys are gang-raped – or they have their throats slit for resisisting. The terrorised survivors are marched northwards and disributed to Arab masters, the women to become concubines, the girls domestics, the boys goatherders'”.

So let’s commemorate the 200th anniversary of the (very limited) “abolition” of slavery, by pledging to get rid of it once and for all in today’s world: and we could start with Darfur.




  1. Jim Denham said,

    And if you want the SWP “line” on this, have a look at “Lenin’s Tomb” (link on the right): the name of the article is “Worthy and unworthy massacres”,dated today. You’ll find some really, truly, sick and reactionary coverage of this same article: the “comments” boxes are particularly nasty, isolationanist and fascistic.

  2. voltaires_priest said,

    Really? I thought his comments boxes consisted of his fellow SWP student fraction members going “Gweat post, Lenin!”, and very little else. Mayhap I was mistaken.

  3. Paul said,

    Noones blamed Zionism yet so it could be a step forward for Ballymenas necessary export.

  4. johng said,

    I love the way that Jim openly suggests that opposing US imperialism is a waste of time (its obviously something that annoys him enourmously). Thats the only reason people like Jim are concerned about Darfur. They wouldn’t give a toss otherwise. Unlike Iraq this is a nice on-message sort of genocide with nice on-message refugee’s (not like the 2 million in Damascus). Well, they’re on message refugee’s so long as they don’t say anything, anyway. Once they start talking Jim might be forced to look elsewhere for victims worthy of his support.

  5. voltairespriest said,

    John: are you concerned about Darfur?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: