Charles Ramsey: star, hero…or racial stereotype?

May 11, 2013 at 11:02 am (celebrity, class, crime, culture, funny, Guardian, Jim D, language, media, Racism, strange situations)

Aisha Harris, writing at Slate, is worried by the media coverage of Charles Ramsey:

“Charles Ramsey, the man who helped rescue three Cleveland women presumed dead after going missing a decade ago, has become an instant Internet meme. It’s hardly surprising—the interviews he gave yesterday provide plenty of fodder for a viral video, including memorable soundbites (“I was eatin’ my McDonald’s”) and lots of enthusiastic gestures. But as Miles Klee and Connor Simpson have noted, Ramsey’s heroism is quickly being overshadowed by the public’s desire to laugh at and autotune his story, and that’s a shame. Ramsey has become the latest in a fairly recent trend of “hilarious” black neighbors, unwitting Internet celebrities whose appeal seems rooted in a ‘colorful’ style that is always immediately recognizable as poor or working-class…

“…It’s difficult to watch these videos and not sense that their popularity has something to do with a persistent, if unconscious, desire to see black people perform. Even before the genuinely heroic Ramsey came along, some viewers had expressed concern that the laughter directed at people like Sweet Brown plays into the most basic stereotyping of blacks as simple-minded ramblers living in the ‘ghetto, socially out of step with the rest of educated America. Black or white, seeing Clark and Dodson merely as funny instances of random poor people talking nonsense is disrespectful at best. And shushing away the question of race seems like wishful thinking.”

Perhaps surprisingly, Gary Younge at the Guardian takes the opposite view:

Millions in America talk like him. But rarely do we hear them unless they are on Maury, Jerry Springer or America’s Most Wanted, the butt of some internet joke or testifying to a shooting in their neighbourhoods. Working-class African Americans are generally wheeled on as exemplars of collective dysfunction. So when Ramsey emerges as heroic, humane, empathetic, funny, compelling, generous and smart, there is a moment of cognitive dissonance on a grand scale. Here is a man with a criminal past and a crime-fighting present…

“…Unvarnished and un-selfconscious, charming and compelling, he reminds me of none so much as Muhammad Ali in his prime, who said: I am America. I am the part you won’t recognise. But get used to me. Black, confident, cocky.

“I’m looking forward to getting used to Charles Ramsey.”

If you’re one of the few people who hasn’t yet seen the film of Mr Ramsey in full flow, you can judge for yourself:

P.S: now there’s a song as well.

Permalink 3 Comments

Ex-Muslim becomes ‘Cultural Muslim’

May 7, 2013 at 1:50 pm (culture, Free Speech, humanism, Islam, islamism, reblogged, religion, secularism)

What’s a ‘Cultural Muslim’?

Above: Muslims for Secular Democracy demonstrate against fundamentalists

For years Saif Rahman has been an agnostic and an ex-Muslim activist. So why is he thinking of calling himself a ‘cultural Muslim’?

–   By Saif Rahman   – reblogged from the Rationalist Association website

For years I’ve been an ex-Muslim activist.

My transition from being a Muslim to ex-Muslim was sudden. After spending years frustratedly attempting to reconcile my personal and religious beliefs, I realised I was being intellectually dishonest and often bending Islam to fit with my personal ideals. My religious cousin from Pakistan crystallized this perfectly when he came to stay with us.

We would often get into long debates about Islam, lasting long into the night. They would often end on a heated note, where he would say something like “You are either Muslim or you are not” or “Either accept everything in Islam is right because it’s been produced by an infallible God, or don’t call yourself a Muslim.”

I can’t recall which contentious issue broke the camel’s back, but on one occasion I was not willing to compromise and called his bluff. I conceded that he was right, and that I was no longer a Muslim. His face registered his shock. In an effort to reverse the damage he asked me to write all my arguments down so he could take them to a learned scholar of Islam.

I did so in an eleven-page letter. I eagerly anticipated his response and even copied in each of my siblings. After three months my brother received a phone call from the cousin saying that he hadn’t forgotten and was still working on the reply. It’s been eight years, and I still haven’t heard back. I turned the letter into a blog post which has since been viewed 50,000 times. That post morphed into my book The Islamist Delusion.

I now run an online forum, Debating Islam, that has 7,300 members, evenly split between Muslims and ex-Muslims. I took over this group from moderate Muslims, who had originally set it up in support of the Imam of Leyton Mosque, Usama Hasan, on whom a fatwa had been declared for his defence of Darwinian evolution in a mosque lecture. When the forum became overrun with extremists trolls issuing death threats it was dissolved and I took over the carcass and repurposed it as a free speech site dedicated to hosting debates between current and former Muslims. The same extremists tried the trick again, and even hacked the site, but eventually with the help of other ex-Muslims, we chased them off. During these battles I collected 139 death threats, but, for me it’s worth it when I see yet another Muslim embracing humanism. I keep a public record of people who have renounced their faith on the site – the Murtad (Infidel) Register – and there is literally no more space for another name.

Yet, despite my busy life as an ex-Muslim activist I’m growing less convinced that “ex-Muslim” is always a useful description. It can come across as confrontational and overly simplistic, and has the tendency to close down debate before it starts. Read the rest of this entry »

Permalink 41 Comments

BBC redefines ‘class’

April 3, 2013 at 6:12 pm (academe, BBC, class, culture, Jim D)

Yet another attempt to suggest that the Marxist notion of class is all out of date (yawn)…

…NB: this item included purely for the purposes of entertainment:

Class examined “in a brand new way”

Continue reading the main story

Mike Savage from the London School of Economics and Fiona Devine from the University of Manchester describe their findings from The Great British Class Survey. Their results identify a new model of class with seven classes ranging from the Elite at the top to a ‘Precariat’ at the bottom.

In January 2011, with the help of BBC Lab UK, we asked the BBC audience to complete a unique questionnaire on different dimensions of class.

“We now have a much more complex class system”

We devised a new way of measuring class, which doesn’t define class just by the job that you do, but by the different kinds of economic, cultural and social resources or ‘capitals’ that people possess.

We asked people about their income, the value of their home and savings, which together is known as ‘economic capital’, their cultural interests and activities, known as ‘cultural capital’ and the number and status of people they know, which is called ‘social capital’.

Amazingly, more than 160,000 of you completed the survey. We now have one of the largest ever studies of class in Great Britain.

The results to date

Our new model includes seven classes.

What class are you?

Class figures

  • The full class survey takes about 25 minutes and covers wealth and job type, interests and social circle
  • Compare your score to the nation’s
  • Receive a personalised coat-of-arms

  • Elite: This is the most privileged class in Great Britain who have high levels of all three capitals. Their high amount of economic capital sets them apart from everyone else.
  • Established Middle Class: Members of this class have high levels of all three capitals although not as high as the Elite. They are a gregarious and culturally engaged class.
  • Technical Middle Class: This is a new, small class with high economic capital but seem less culturally engaged. They have relatively few social contacts and so are less socially engaged.
  • New Affluent Workers: This class has medium levels of economic capital and higher levels of cultural and social capital. They are a young and active group.
  • Emergent Service Workers: This new class has low economic capital but has high levels of ‘emerging’ cultural capital and high social capital. This group are young and often found in urban areas.
  • Traditional Working Class: This class scores low on all forms of the three capitals although they are not the poorest group. The average age of this class is older than the others.
  • Precariat: This is the most deprived class of all with low levels of economic, cultural and social capital. The everyday lives of members of this class are precarious.

Other unique findings

  • Twentieth-century middle-class and working-class stereotypes are out of date. Only 39% of participants fit into the Established Middle Class and Traditional Working Class categories.

“The very rich and very poor are still with us in the 21st Century”

  • The traditional working class is changing. It’s smaller than it was in the past. The new generation are more likely to be Affluent Workers or Emergent Service Workers.
  • People consume culture in a complicated way. The Technical Middle Class are less culturally engaged while emergent service workers participate in various activities.
  • The extremes of our class system are very important. The Elite and Precariat often get forgotten with more focus on the middle and working classes. We’ve discovered detailed findings about them.

What did we measure?

People tend to think they belong to a particular class on the basis of their job and income. These are aspects of economic capital. Sociologists think that your class is indicated by your cultural capital and social capital. Our analysis looked at the relationship between economic, cultural and social capital.

The findings have been published in the journal Sociology and were presented at a conference of the British Sociological Association.

 

Permalink 5 Comments

Louis Armstrong’s greetings to the Irish

March 17, 2013 at 4:49 pm (black culture, comedy, culture, good people, humanism, internationalism, Ireland, jazz, Jim D, multiculturalism, music, surrealism)

On St Patrick’s Day, we bring you perhaps the most bizarre lyric ever sung by Louis Armstrong: “I was born in Ireland (Ha, Ha)”…

Louis Armstrong And His Hot Five, November 1926: Irish Black Bottom

Louis’s tireless biographer Ricky Riccardi writes:

Admittedly, this is not songwriting as its finest but as a novelty, it’s good fun. The “black bottom” was a popular dance of the 1920s so this tune humorously pretends that it’s also taken Ireland by storm.  If Louis had to record something so silly in the 1950s, critics would scream at the producers for forcing it on him.  But “Irish Black Bottom” was written by the aforementioned Percy Venable so more than likely, it was a staple of Louis’s act at the Sunset.  And can’t you imagine Louis bringing down the house with that vocal?  That “ha, ha” he gives after singing “And I was born in Ireland,” breaks me up every time.  I can only imagine what it did to the audiences who heard him do it live. 

The song begins with the funny sound of Louis and his Hot Five swinging through a sample of the Irish classic “Where the River Shannon Flows” before Louis swings out with the main melody, which is predominantly in a minor mode until the end. Louis’s lead sounds great and Dodds is bouncing around as usual but trombonist Hy Clark, a substitute for Kid Ory, sounds hesitant and doesn’t add much.  After a chorus and an interlude by pianist Lil Armstrong, Louis takes the vocal.  If you can’t make it out, here’s what he says:

All you heard for years in Ireland,
was the “Wearin’ Of The Green”,
but the biggest change that’s come in Ireland
I have ever seen.
All the laddies and the cooies
laid aside their Irish reels,
and I was born in Ireland
(Ha, Ha), so imagine how I feels.

Now Ireland’s gone Black Bottom crazy,
see them dance,
you ought to see them dance.
Folks supposed to be related, even dance,
I mean they dance.
They play that strain,
works right on their brain.
Now it goes Black Bottom,
a new rhythm’s drivin’ the folks insane.
I hand you no Blarney, when I say
that song really goes,
and they put it over with a wow,
I mean now.
All over Ireland
you can see the people dancin’ it,
’cause Ireland’s gone Black Bottom crazy now

I don’t know how you can’t get swept up in that offering. Armstrong doesn’t so much sing it as shout it, or talk it, but his spirit sure gets the message across (though sometimes, he’s so far from the written melody, it sounds like he’s singing a different song on top of Lil’s chording on the piano). After the vocal, Clark and Dodds take forgettable short solos and breaks before Louis carries the troops home with brio.  Louis’s lip trill towards the end is particularly violent and right before his closing breaks, he dips into his bag for a favorite phrases, one that ended both “You’re Next” and “Big Fat Ma and Skinny Pa.”  The concluding break is so perfect in its phrasing and choice of notes that I believe it might have already been set in stone by Pops during his live performances of the tune at the Sunset.  Either way, that’s no reason to criticize him; it’s a perfect ending and puts an emphatic stamp on a very entertaining record.

That’s all for now. Have a happy St. Patrick’s day and don’t forget to mix in a little Louis with your Guiness.  I hand you no blarney, it’s a great combination…

Permalink 2 Comments

Vieux Farka Touré and the music of Mali: “spreading the news of what has happened to us and what is still happening”

February 22, 2013 at 8:08 pm (africa, anti-fascism, culture, Human rights, humanism, islamism, liberation, music, national liberation, song, terror, The blues, Uncategorized)

From Chicago magazine:

By Kevin McKeough

Since the late, legendary Ali Farka Touré first brought the music of Mali to widespread attention in the mid-1980s, the western African nation’s musicians have beguiled listeners worldwide with their trance-inducing guitar patterns and Arabic flavored keening. Tragically, Mali has received more attention lately for the violent conflict in the country’s northern region, which encompasses part of the vast Sahara Desert. After Islamist extremists recently seized control of a large part of the area, including the storied city of Timbuktu, and committed numerous human rights violations, in January France sent soldiers into its former colony to drive out the militants. While the French military has retaken most of the area, the situation remains unstable both in northern Mali and in the south, where the country’s military has deposed two successive governments and reportedly is engaging in harsh repression.

Vieux Farka Touré, Ali Farka Touré’s son and a world music star in his own right, was performing Friday, Feb. 22, at the Old Town School of Folk Music. C Notes contacted Touré, who lives in the Malian capital, Bamako, to gain his perspective of the travails afflicting his country and how he and other Malian musicians are responding.

What are your thoughts about the Islamists’ invasion of northern Mali and France’s efforts to drive them out of the country? My thoughts are the same as everyone in Mali. The invasion of the Islamists was hell on earth. It was a nightmare unlike anything we have ever experienced. We are very grateful to President Hollande and the French for their intervention. For the moment at least they have saved our country.

How have these disruptions affected you personally? I am safe and my family is safe. But there is great uncertainty in Mali today. Nobody knows what we can expect in the next years, months or even days. So it is very bad for the spirit to be living in this kind of situation.

What’s your reaction to the Islamist invaders banning music in the areas they controlled? I was furious. It broke my heart like it did for everyone else. It was as though life itself was taken from us.

You were part of an all-star group of Malian musicians who recently recorded the song “Mali-ko” in response to the conflict. Please talk about the project and why you participated in it. Musicians in Mali play a very important role in society. We are like journalists, telling people what is happening. We are also responsible for speaking out when there are problems, and we are responsible for lifting the spirit of the nation. So that is why we made “Mali-ko.” Fatoumata [Diawara] organized everyone and we all spent some time hanging out in the studio and doing our little parts. It was a very nice project. I’m happy with the result and I’m happy that it got a lot of attention in the United States and in Europe.

Aside from the song, what role do you think musicians can play in responding to the situation in Mali? We can do what we are already doing—we are going everywhere we can around the world and spreading the news of what has happened to us and what is still happening. Equally, we must continue to entertain our people and keep them proud to be from Mali. For Malians, music is the greatest source of pride so we must work very hard to keep that pride alive. Right now it is not easy for people to be proud and have faith.

What do you think needs to be done in Mali? First and most importantly, we need to continue to drive out all the militants from our country. There is no future for Mali with terrorists living amongst us. Period. Also we must move quickly to engage in free and open elections to restore the faith and the legitimacy of our country in the eyes of the world and its people. These two things are the most critical at this time.

Your music resembles your father’s but has its own distinct quality. Can you talk about what you’re trying to do in the music, how and why you combine traditional and contemporary styles? With my music I try not to think very much about what I am doing. I just let myself be open to inspiration and it will take me where I need to go. So I am not thinking “for my next album I must do a song with reggae, or I must do an acoustic album because this will be good for my career” or anything like that. I think all artists are like lightning rods for inspiration and you must be open to it or it will not strike you. If you try to do something artistic it will not be as good as if you just let inspiration decide what you are doing. So my style is just based on what influences me and what inspires me.

For a country with a small population, Mali has produced a large number of internationally recognized musicians. Why do you think the country has so many excellent musicians? This is the mystery that everyone wants to understand. I do not know for sure why there are so many big international stars from Mali. But I know this: We take our music very, very seriously. It is at the core of our culture and it is the definition of Mali as a people. There is no Mali without Malian music. So I think this inspires many young people to try to become musicians. Maybe everywhere in the world has this kind of talent but there is not as strong a push for everyone to develop their talents in music. But honestly, I don’t know. We are lucky for this great richness of talent. That is for sure.

Kevin McKeough is a contributing music critic for Chicago magazine

See also ‘The Hendrix of the Sahara’

Permalink Leave a Comment

On marginalised groups and fair-weather friends

February 3, 2013 at 10:56 am (Anti-Racism, anti-semitism, conspiracy theories, culture, Guest post, humanism, islamism, multiculturalism, music, philosophy, populism, song)

Guest post by Robin Carmody

.

One of my favourite songs is “Smiling Faces Sometimes”, a US Top 3 hit in 1971 for The Undisputed Truth which represents the apogee of Motown’s experimentation with “psychedelic soul” (it never charted in Britain, of course, and here begins the paradox of the Left in modern British history; the radio and TV structure which denied it exposure – and which allowed Jimmy Savile to do what he did – was the same one which enabled outstanding achievements in drama and documentary).  Written in the disillusioned wake of a turbulent period in black American history – the achievements of the Civil Rights movement having been co-opted by the bourgeois New Left which were, between them, alienating the white working class from the Democrats and setting the stage for the eventual Reagan and Bush years and the embrace, as in Britain, of populist reactionary nationalist politics by the very class which suffers most from it in practice – it suggests to marginalised groups, with the lines “your enemy can do you no harm” and “beware of the pat on the back, it just might hold you back”, that those co-opting their causes for their own purposes may, in fact, do their advances and acceptance far greater damage than the unequivocally and unashamedly right-wing and racist.  Very much the same thing applies today, when the EDL and similar groups are – fraudulently – presenting themselves as the only true supporters of Jewish and LGBT rights, and many right-wing columnists – especially but by no means exclusively those on the Murdoch papers – are making themselves out to understand working-class forms of cultural expression through popular art.
.
Reading the works of Peter Hitchens is strangely reassuring in this context; precisely because he is such an extreme reactionary, he cannot possibly fool anyone that he represents progressive causes as a bulwark against Islamism in the way that many other right-wing columnists – who, underneath it all, are just as profoundly opposed to working-class emancipation and self-expression as they ever were – have successfully been able to do.  In a recent piece on his blog, Hitchens Minor admitted a total lack of concern or interest in what happens in Algeria or Mali, implied that Islamists’ criticism of Western values are justified because Western society apparently consists of nothing more than “eating too much and driving around in cars”, and inferred that any concerns about Al-Qaeda should be addressed towards fast food franchises, which are apparently far better-organised, instead, as though irritation about cultural change from the world of your childhood were on a par with the most extreme forms of hatred and bigotry.
.
This extreme nativist British version of Islamism – suggesting that Western life and culture have become decadent and deserve to be undermined and threatened, and effectively agreeing with Islamists on such issues as LGBT rights and the “evil” of popular music but cynically not feeling able to say it in those words in that order – is in some ways strangely reassuring, because in my childhood it was pretty much the default option for the Daily Mail, whose op-eds were still then largely written by the pre-pop culture generation to which Hitchens Minor is a throwback.  The world that existed then, where nativists, conservatives and closet anti-Semites supported the most nativist, conservative and openly anti-Semitic force in the modern world while liberals, internationalists and progressives opposed it – the divisions that formed themselves in my childhood at the time of the Satanic Verses controversy, when Rushdie was defended by the SWP and The Guardian and condemned by Tory government ministers and Tory papers – really makes far more sense than the world that exists today, where conservatives pretend to support progressive causes out of geopolitical convenience, while much of the Left have given up those causes as geopolitically inconvenient, and allowed the very people they should be defending to fall into the hands of the most reactionary forces in the modern world.
.
I myself at one point absorbed the Left-wing version of the Hitchens Minor position as most notably promoted by Neil Clark and David Lindsay, believing that the global influences of popular culture were the only true threat to Britain, as though British culture were a frozen object that must never be allowed to pick up any new influences, rather than a palimpsest whose greatest strength has been its absorption – and hybridisation, giving the working class a form of identity that official, unchanging culture could never have provided them – of influences marginalised elsewhere.  I believed, as though I had been Richard Hoggart or Ted Willis in 1963, that there was no real difference between Craig Douglas and the Beatles, that the latter were ultimately as much a ruling-class tool and a passive, one-way absorption of mass consumerism as the former – I had allowed the effects of almost all right-wing columnists today except Hitchens Minor distorting their meaning to distract me from their real meaning at the time.  I had – and there is evidence of this out there in my name, and I urge those reading this not to search for it – fully absorbed the effects of the EDL, and before it Griffin’s BNP, pretending to care about Jewish and gay rights and right-wing columnists pretending to believe in the full implications of popular culture as a working-class movement.  That is, I had become a Left Fogey – rehabilitating the puritanism and fear of new experiences of the Old Left out of a mistaken belief that there was no difference between One Direction and Scrufizzer, a failure to recognise that the former are simply a ruling-class safety valve whereas the latter is a genuine expression of social alienation and rage at the ruling class’s betrayal of millions, a deluded insistence that the support for the former shown by Murdoch journalists meant that they were also unafraid of the latter, and therefore I didn’t need to support him against the ruling class (whereas now I know that I very much do, and that the right-wing columnists who do like rock music are, if anything, more afraid of him than Hitchens Minor is).
.
Much worse even than that, though, I had become cynically indifferent to anti-Semitism and in some cases even homophobia and political censorship, always responding with an almost robotic “what about anti-Muslim headlines in the Express” whenever the dubious imagery of cartoons in The Guardian or the New Statesman which portrayed Israel as global puppet-master was invoked, as though two wrongs made a right, as though one set of papers which are unashamedly and openly prejudiced justified another set of papers which claim not to be so reducing themselves to that level, when in fact I now know that it makes it a million times worse, that the existence of populist-nationalist right-wing papers demonising one group is an argument for liberal-internationalist papers to be better, not to demonise another group.  My stance was very much that, because British Jews had Richard Littlejohn on their side, they didn’t need people like me, that the support of those for whom they are merely fairweather friends – who only support Jewish causes because of who Jews are not and who they can be defined against; in other words they are not pro-Jewish first and foremost and support Jewish interests entirely in negative terms – justified people on my political side abandoning them and leaving them to their fate.  I was very close to the path which, grotesquely, saw Unite Against Fascism linking up with the most homophobic forces in modern British life to prevent a Gay Pride march in East London, while the EDL pretended to support it.
.
Now I know that Littlejohn and his ilk would, had they lived in another place at another time, supported the wearing of yellow stars or at the very least the portrayal of Jews as the ultimate “Other”, the ultimate threat, and my mission now is to reclaim their defence and their causes from those fairweather friends – to expose the Murdochian supporters of minority groups and pop-cultural radicalism as cynical operators, and to bring such causes and their advocates back to the Left, to reassert our side as their true supporters and as the true opponents of religious fundamentalism and mediaevalism.  Likewise, my response to a repulsive character such as the neo-Powellite Tory MP and Nazi impersonator Aidan Burley – infamous for his tweets during the Olympics opening ceremony – has shifted.  I am as sickened as I ever was by his blatant double standards, with the intend of dividing and conquering and splitting “good” working class from “bad” working class – his mental picture of Robert Plant or Ozzy Osbourne, who barely acknowledged their West Midlands origins in any of their music, as true, indigenous, native island Britons while Trilla, who has recorded an anthem celebrating Birmingham and redefining civic pride for a new generation, is to be treated as a “bloody foreigner” who should “go back where he comes from”.  But my response to such political cynicism – so much more slippery and harder to pin down than the Toryism of Zeppelin and Sabbath’s peak years – is not, as it would have been a few years ago, to dismiss as worthless neoliberal paraphernalia the music of those bands, to regard it as simply what these people want it to become, justification for institutional classism and racism, and leave it to them, therefore effectively letting them win.  It is to recapture for the Left – for our side – the primal howl of this music, its sense of alienation from the ruling class and its rage against their abuses of power (especially so in the case of early Sabbath), which channelled the isolation and frustration of the blues just as Trilla and Lady Leshurr channel those still denied full belonging even in modern America.  It is to restore this music to its original socio-political and cultural meaning, to assert that it has more in common with Trilla and Lady Leshurr than it has with those misusing it today for their own purposes.  It is to tell the Aidan Burleys and Richard Littlejohns of this world that, however much they think they own this music, they never really will, just as much as they will never own LGBT causes or unconditional opposition to anti-Semitism.
.
This is part of the Left’s responsibility, and let us distance ourselves from all the neo-reactionaries and Left Fogeys who deny it.  And let us curse, again, the emergence of a new generation of right-wing columnists and thinkers who have allowed reactionary socialism and Left Fogeyism to resurge on “our” side.  As Norman Whitfield and The Undisputed Truth foresaw all too accurately 42 years ago, back when the future fulminator-in-chief was a student Trotskyite, Peter Hitchens is the least of our worries.

Permalink 5 Comments

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 257 other followers