Chavez and ‘post-mortem leftism’
March 9, 2013 at 8:21 am (democracy, Latin America, liberation, Marxism, populism, Roger M, socialism, stalinism)
Roger McCarthy writes:
This 2010 piece from M.A. Torres in Platypus Review #25 on Chavez is excellent, and concludes thus:
The question stands: If authentic internationalist Marxism is dead, from what standpoint does one launch a critique of Chavez and his followers without joining the Venezuelan opposition nostalgic for neoliberalism? The only answer is history: The consciousness that the present has fallen short of what once seemed politically possible, and that this possibility could once again become available. The knowledge that there was once such a thing as an international Left that was able to intervene, transform, and lead social movements around the world in the direction of the overcoming of capitalism. The awareness that the mass politicization of the Bolivarian Revolution, which has put the word “socialism” on the lips of hundreds of thousands of working people, will end up as yet another wasted opportunity if such a Left is not reconstituted.
Admittedly, this standpoint is not much to start with. It is clearly not as immediately gratifying as the self-deceiving “optimism” of supposedly Marxist publications such as the International Socialist Review and the Monthly Review. But the game they are playing is no more than a spectator sport. Cheering for team Chavez is a way for such post-mortem leftists to hold on to dear life. It is how they justify their existence and convince themselves that they are still serving a purpose: The good fight is still being fought; even if they are helpless, they can be complacent in this helplessness, since they can always look at the next populist strongman or, even better, wait for the next American invasion of a Third World country to give them a new lease on life. But if we are to reconstitute an international revolutionary Left, the first step will be to stop kidding ourselves. People continue to struggle, but the struggle to overcome capitalism has not really been sustained. Revolutions with a hope of actually overcoming capitalism around the world are now a distant memory, at best. The current changes in Venezuela cannot contribute to any real revolution until a genuine Left challenges the regime that has instituted them. But such a feat will be impossible if we do not finally get it into our heads that the fatalistic slogan, “¡Patria, socialismo o muerte!” means the exact opposite of the visionary words, “¡Proletarios de todos los países, uníos!”
‘Post-mortem left’ is an extraordinarily useful term…..

Roger McCarthy (@RF_McCarthy) said,
March 9, 2013 at 9:22 am
Title typo? – or is that an intentional neologism?
And the Left being dead – not ‘resting’ but as Rosa Luxemburg described the SPD an actual stinking corpse is the central theme of the Platypus people:
http://platypus1917.org/2007/11/01/vicissitudes-of-historical-consciousness-and-possibilities-for-emancipatory-social-politics-today/
Jim Denham said,
March 9, 2013 at 4:56 pm
Typo, Roger: thanks! Will correct!
Though, come to thinlk of it, “leftistism” is quite a good neologism…
Claire Boxer said,
March 11, 2013 at 4:23 pm
This piece, under the guise of a critique of the Chavez supporting left, spells out the impossibility of socialism. No wonder you like it.
Ross Wolfe said,
March 30, 2013 at 11:06 pm
Thanks for reposting this piece. I agree, Marco’s article is the best.