Time to call the Scottish PSC what they are: racists

September 3, 2012 at 9:25 pm (anti-semitism, israel, Jim D, Middle East, palestine, Racism, scotland)

The Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign (SPSC) has long been known as more fanatically anti-Israel than the rest of the PSC. Whereas the ‘main’ (ie English) PSC generally evades the issue of whether Israel has a right to exist in any shape or form, the SPSC make little secret of their desire to see the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state. And while the rest of the PSC make at least some efforts to avoid the charge of antisemitism, the SPSC seems not to even care.

Jackie Kemp writes in the Observer about the SPSC’s shameful disruption of performances by the Israeli dance company Batshava:

Batsheva, the Israeli contemporary dance group, should have been one of the hits of this year’s Edinburgh international festival. They got five-star reviews for their witty, sexy and creative show.

As Batsheva are an ethnically mixed group of performers who danced to a “mash up” including the Star Wars theme and Wagner and who, at home, have incurred the wrath of the Orthodox community for a routine involving them stripping off to a Passover song, it would seem bizarre to hold them responsible for any Israeli government policies. Surely it would make as much sense to blame the ballerinas of the Mariinsky (formerly the Kirov) for Putin’s human rights abuses. Indeed, Batsheva’s choreographer, Ohad Naharin, has said he is “in disagreement” with his government whereas the prima ballerina of the Mariinsky, Diana Vishneva, has maintained a studied silence over the fate of Pussy Riot.

But while Mariinsky played a sumptuous Cinderella at the Festival theatre to sell out audiences, with a line of chauffeur-driven cars waiting outside to pick up dignitaries, including government ministers, the Batsheva had a very different fate. Their show played to half-empty houses and was continually disrupted inside the theatre. It was a tense and nervous – if well-coiffed in shades of grey – Edinburgh contemporary dance audience that made it into the foyer through the hundreds of shouting demonstrators taking up most of the pavement outside.

The night I was there, the show was stopped three times; the next night it was four. As an audience member, I must confess I felt alarmed and vulnerable. I didn’t know what was about to happen. The 82-year-old Dutchman next to me patted my arm and murmured: “This is not Kristallnacht. I remember that”

Despite the courage and professionalism of the performers on stage it must have been a nerve-racking gig for them; in other countries protesters have remained outside the theatre. No one was arrested for any of the disruptions, the Scottish police taking the view that it was not illegal.

The dancers were being held responsible for the situation of Palestinians on the West Bank and in Gaza on the very thin grounds that their work had been praised by the Israeli government and they take government money – both things that apply to the Mariinsky.

A group of Scottish writers headed by Scotland’s national poet Liz Lochhead (who has also taken government money on occasion) even wrote to the press calling for a cultural boycott of all Israeli companies and artists. This was what was effectively being imposed on the rest of us by the pickets outside.

I felt personally deeply ashamed and upset that these renowned international artists who were visiting the EIF were unable to perform their show in peace. I have spent the last year researching a book (Confusion to Our Enemies: Selected Journalism of Arnold Kemp; Arnold was my father). In the course of that, I read up on the work of my grandfather Robert Kemp – he was one of the founders of the Edinburgh festival and coined the term the fringe.

It was started in the aftermath of the Second World War, to bring back the joy, colour and vibrancy of cultural expression into people’s lives, lives that for the most part had been grey and miserable. It was started so that people from different countries could communicate heart to heart in the international language of art and culture.

It would be a tragedy if people who live, not in the shadow of war but in relative ease and comfort, manage to achieve their wish and create a cultural climate in Scotland where it is impossible for artists to perform because of the passports they hold.

******************************************************************************************************

The greatest tragedy of all is that disruption and attempted boycotting of liberal Israeli artists (and academics) will not help the Palestinians’ struggle for a viable homeland: it will, if anything, set it back. The truth is that people like the SPSC are motivated not, primarily, by support for the Palestinians, but by hatred of Israel and all its people.

There is a name for those who attack people solely on the basis of their nationality, ethnic and/or national origin: racists. That’s what the SPSC are.

14 Comments

  1. L Robertson said,

    anti Scottish?

    • Robin Carmody said,

      I’m not sure what the above is supposed to mean …

      If criticising the exaggerated *pseudo-post-colonialism* and third-worldism of some Scottish nationalists, which may be coming through in the SPSC, is “anti-Scottish”, then I suppose it is. But I don’t think it is “anti-Scottish”, any more than criticising the EDL’s *idea* of England is “anti-English”. There are many political and cultural interpretations of Scottishness, and “opposing everything identified with the West for its own sake” is only one of them. You can’t shut down debate that easily.

  2. Faster Pussycat Miaow! Miaow! Miaow! said,

    The Russian Tory Party is the future of socialism doncha know? Imagine Call-me-Dave and Gideon if they could actually off opponents with impunity.

  3. dunno much about history said,

    The greatest tragedy at all for Jabba the Denham is not the oppression of the Palestinians, but that a dance was disrupted. What a racist shit.

    • Robin Carmody said,

      Someone is a “racist shit” if they believe that art should stand or fall on its own merits, regardless of the government of its creators’ country of origin?

      Nice twisting of language there.

    • sackcloth and ashes said,

      Your moniker applies nicely to yourself, troll.

  4. Just saying said,

    Are not most if not all pollitical persuations pepperd with the outragous radical elemenet.Israels artisrty as Palestinian and for that matter Scottish,will survive on its merit.Outside rabid lunacy.

  5. sackcloth and ashes said,

    It used to be a principle of left-wing politics that you did not hold people accountable for the policies of their governments, but it seems that there is one ethnic/national group where this doesn’t apply.

    The English PSC shares the racist bigotry of its Scottish counterpart. Its regional websites have been exposed as containing anti-Semitic tropes and apologias for Holocaust denial. The only difference is that the SPSC’s more overt in its fascism.

    • bler4eg omceonmretatry said,

      What would you know about “left-wing politics” you fucking lower than vermin tory piece of shit? Kill yourself scum.

      • Monsuer Jelly est Formidable and Olympian In Almost Supreme Wiggins Stylee said,

        he really is a fuckking sockfull of dieOOOreaaHHH and puss. and a coCk>

  6. Jimmy Glesga said,

    They are a wierd looking bunch the SPSC I pass them on Buchanan St most Saturdays. Twilight Zone.

  7. Just saying said,

  8. Just saying said,

    Just clicked that link and i see they say its no longer available,sorry bout that.

    What i is about is censorship or more importantly, the artist dictating her form of censorship.It is a work of media art by a lady called Sophia Al-Maria.

    The work is instaled in a art gallery similar to that of a photo booth.What its contains is females of Qatari origines getting dressed for a wedding.Nothing salacious, just Musim woman preparing for a cousins wedding without head dress.

    As said, the artist has asked that the video only be shown to females.And as far as the laws of property or in this case, intelectual ownership, in my opinion has that right.However, the storm that it has stired is, who or what has the right to exclude those of diffrent gender and cultural beliefs to exclude a specific gender from viewing a work of art in a public museum..

  9. Just saying said,

    And they only published it yesterday the link that is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 281 other followers

%d bloggers like this: