Open letter to the UK left: Do you want the EU to break up?

May 17, 2012 at 5:40 pm (AWL, capitalism, capitalist crisis, democracy, economics, Europe, Greece, internationalism, left, reblogged, socialism, Socialist Party, stalinism, SWP, unions, workers)

Open letter to the UK hard-left, from the Alliance for Workers Liberty:

parisprotest.jpg RMT anti-EU protesters (Photo: Andrew Wiard )

Dear comrades,

Do you really want the European Union to break up? The majority of Greek workers do not. In the 6 May election, 70% voted for parties opposed to the cuts, but polls show that 80% want Greece to stay within the EU and within the euro.

The party that did best in the election, the left coalition Syriza, says that a left government in Greece should refuse the cuts, call the bluff of the EU leaders — who may want cuts, but also want to stop the eurozone breaking up — and enforce a renegotiation.

They want a united Europe without cuts. So do we. If the Greek left wins a majority, and the EU refuses to concede, then we want a workers’ government in Greece which will break with EU leaders but not “leave Europe” — which will instead fight to spread workers’ rule across Europe.

Yet for decades now most of the British left — and the left in a few other European countries, such as Denmark — has agitated “against the EU”. The agitation has suggested, though rarely said openly, we should welcome and promote every pulling-apart of the EU, up to and including the full re-erection of barriers between nation-states.

Now it’s not certain that the EU/ ECB/ IMF troika will dare cut off funds to the Greek government, and force it into “defaulting” on its debt (failing to make payments on the debt when they’re due). If Greece defaults, it is not certain that it will quit or be forced out of the euro.

If Greece quits the euro, it’s not certain that the exit will set off an unravelling of the whole eurozone. And even if the whole eurozone unravels, the underlying EU structure could remain solid.

An argument can be made — debatable, but not absurd, and not necessarily “anti-EU” — that realistically a Greek government would do better now to negotiate an orderly exit from the euro, rather than to plunge on towards a high probability of forced and chaotic exit.

The economist who has argued most strongly for Greece to negotiate an exit from the euro, Costas Lapavitsas, also insists that he is not calling for Greece to quit the EU.

Yet the possibility of a serious unravelling of the patchwork, bureaucratic semi-unification of Europe, slowly developed over the last sixty years, is more real today than ever before. The decisive push for unravelling, if it comes, will probably be from the nationalist and populist right.

And that calls the bluff of a whole swathe of the British left.

For decades, most of the British left has been “anti-EU” as a matter of faith. In Britain’s 1975 referendum on withdrawing from the EU, almost the whole left, outside AWL’s forerunner Workers’ Fight, campaigned for withdrawal. Since then the left has hesitated explicitly to demand withdrawal. It has limited itself to “no to bosses’ Europe” agitation, implying but not spelling out a demand for the EU to be broken up.

The agitation has allowed the left to eat its cake and have it. The left can chime in with populist-nationalist “anti-Europe” feeling, which is stronger in Britain than in any other EU country. It can also cover itself by suggesting that it is not really anti-European, but only dislikes the “bosses’” character of the EU.

As if a confederation of capitalist states could be anything other than capitalist. As if the cross-Europe policy of a collection of neo-liberal governments could be anything other than neo-liberal.

As if the material force behind neo-liberal cuts were the relatively flimsy Brussels bureaucracy, rather than the mighty bureaucratic-military-industrial complexes of member states. As if the answer is to oppose confederation and cross-Europeanism as such, rather than the capitalist, neo-liberal, bureaucratic character of both member states and the EU.

As if the EU is somehow more sharply capitalist, anti-worker, and neo-liberal than the member states. In Britain more than any other country we have seen successive national governments, both Tory and New Labour, repeatedly objecting to EU policy as too soft, too “social”, too likely to entrench too many workers’ rights.

As if the answer is to pit nations against Europe, rather than workers against bosses and bankers.

When Socialist Worker, in a recent Q&A piece, posed itself the question, “wouldn’t things be better for workers if Britain pulled out of the EU?”, it answered itself with a mumbling “yes, but” rather than a ringing “yes”.

Socialist Worker is against Britain being part of a bosses’ Europe”. Oh? And against Britain being part of a capitalist world, too?

Britain would be better off in outer space? Or walled off from the world North-Korea-style? “But withdrawing from the EU wouldn’t guarantee workers’ rights — the Tories remain committed to attacking us”. Indeed. And just as much so as the EU leaders, no?

As recently as 2009, the Socialist Party threw itself into a electoral coalition called No2EU. Every week in its “Where We Stand” it declaims: “No to the bosses’ neo-liberal European Union!”, though that theme rarely appears in its big headlines.

The RMT rail union, in some ways the most left-wing union in Britain, backed No2EU and today backs the “People’s Pledge”. This “Pledge” is a campaign to call for parliamentary candidates to demand a referendum on British withdrawal from the EU, and support them only if they agree.

It was initiated by, and is mostly run by, right-wing Tories, but fronted by a Labour leftist, Mark Seddon. It is backed by many Tory MPs — and by some Labour left MPs such as Kelvin Hopkins, John Cryer, and Ronnie Campbell, and by Green MP Caroline Lucas.

The referendum call is a soft-soap demand for British withdrawal, based on the hope that a majority would vote to quit. (In a recent poll, 55% of people agreed with the statement “Britain should remain a full member of the European Union”, but 55% also agreed with the statement “Britain should leave the European Union”, so…)

Even the demand for withdrawal is a soft-soap, “tactical” gambit. In principle Britain could quit the EU without disrupting much. It could be like Norway, Iceland, Switzerland: pledged to obey all the EU’s “Single Market” rules (i.e. all the neo-liberal stuff) though opting out of a say in deciding the rules; exempt from contributing to the EU budget but also opting out from receiving EU structural and regional funds.

That is not what the no-to-EU-ers want. They want Britain completely out. They want all the other member-states out too. A speech by RMT president Alex Gordon featured on the No2EU website spells it out: “Imperialist, supranational bodies such as the EU seek to roll back democratic advances achieved in previous centuries… Progressive forces must respond to this threat by defending and restoring national democracy. Ultimately, national independence is required for democracy to flourish…”

For decades “anti-EU” agitation has been like background music in the left’s marketplace — designed to soothe the listeners and make them more receptive to the goods on offer, but not for attentive listening. If the music should be played at all, then it should be turned up now.

But do you really want the EU broken up? What would happen?

The freedom for workers to move across Europe would be lost. “Foreign” workers in each country from other ex-EU states would face disapproval at best.

There would be a big reduction in the productive capacities of the separate states, cut off from broader economic arenas.

Governments and employers in each state would be weaker in capitalist world-market competition, and thus would be pushed towards crude cost-cutting, in the same way that small capitalist businesses, more fragile in competition, use cruder cost-cutting than the bigger employers.

There would be more slumps and depression, in the same way that the raising of economic barriers between states in the 1930s lengthened and deepened the slump then.

Nationalist and far-right forces, already the leaders of anti-EU political discourse everywhere, would be “vindicated” and boosted. Democracy would shrink, not expand. The economically-weaker states in Europe, cut off from the EU aid which has helped them narrow the gap a bit, would suffer worst, and probably some would fall to military dictatorships.

Before long the economic tensions between the different nations competing elbow-to-elbow in Europe’s narrow cockpit would lead to war, as they did repeatedly for centuries, and especially in 1914 and 1939.

The left should fight, not to go backwards from the current bureaucratic, neo-liberal European Union, but forward, towards workers’ unity across Europe, a democratic United States of Europe, and a socialist United States of Europe.

Alliance for Workers’ Liberty

13 Comments

  1. Phoenix One UK said,

    Greece has only one winning move. Exit the euro and default.

    Do you seriously believe the British people are not aware of what is happening in Greece? Do you seriously believe the British people condone what is happening to Greek people.

    Take a long hard look of what Greece has endured. How much worst could it be if Greece exits and defaults? Defaults are nothing new. Take a look and Iceland, it went bust too not long ago. Now look at it.

    How long have the Greek people suffered? How many of the Greek people gave up their own children because they could not feed them? How many are even looking in garabage bins for food? How many more years of EU imposed austerity awaits Greece? Merkles said years, and I found it could be at least another decade of more and the same with no real end in site.

    Greece has only one winning move. Exit the euro and default. Start again, and this time don’t surrender democracy for promises of gold that will probably never materialise anyway.

    Good luck Greece.

  2. Chris said,

    a brilliant article

  3. modernity's ghost said,

    I find it hard to understand why socialists, and even some Marxists, who used to pride themselves understanding on economics, can’t see the consequences from the Greek people if they should leave the Euro.

    1. They would have to reconstitute the new currency, say the new Drachma.

    2. And then get their economy back into some shape.

    Sounds very easy but the reality would be terrible for the Greeks.

    In the period between starting a new currency and getting their economy back the Greeks would have great difficulty in trading with other nations (who would naturally assume that the Greeks could default on any debt). They might ask for significant collateral or hard currencies.

    Bear in mind the Greek economy is not self-sufficient, therefore, in interim period It would have to do established trading links, again with everyone else.

    The new drachma is liable to be undervalued on the currency market, and so in turn would be Greek labour, they would have to pay over the odds for imports, which could neither mean inflation, or complete paralysis.

    Whatever way you look at it the Greeks would still be in world capitalism and have to find a way of trading, importing, exporting, dealing with old and new currencies, and trying to do so with the minimum stress.

    There are would be pandemonium.

    It would be a terrible situation, and I imagine much worse than it is now for that interim period. The Extreme Right would grow, immigrants, migrants and anyone perceived to be a non-Greek would probably be physically attacked. Racial violence increased, etc etc

    All not good for the Greeks.

  4. Innocent Abroad said,

    [3] All very true (except that the markets would price the risk of a second default, which is why the New Drachma would be so weak). Alas, the Greeks can’t stay [b]in[/b] the Euro either: your last sentence applies equally in either case. I predict a return of the Colonels.

  5. modernity's ghost said,

    I know why the new drachma would be weak, except I didn’t want to spell it out, as I assumed readers would fill in any blanks..

    The question for socialists, who have little or NO say on whether or not the Greeks will leave or stay in the Euro, is what is best for the working classes?

    Let’s forget the geopolitics, the anti-EU sentiment, etc and think what will happen in a material way.

    The period between currencies, of say 3 to 9 months, would be turmoil, people would end up starving, etc etc

    The Extreme Right would grow and grow. The working class will suffer.

  6. Faster Pussycat Miaow! Miaow! Miaow! said,

    The working class will suffer

    You thick, no mark, weird Tory scum. The working class are *already* suffering you vile worthless piece of shit.

  7. Monsuer Jelly est Formidable said,

  8. modernity's ghost said,

    will suffer more… you illiterate middle class gotshite

  9. Faster Pussycat Miaow! Miaow! Miaow! said,

    What’s it like rimming out hedge fund managers and corporate lawyers Morality? Does it taste nice?

    You go on about ‘the working class’ and yet you never support workers’ parties or workers’ candidates. Instead you support austerity, cuts, neoliberalism, and ‘there is no alternative’ Tory scum who attack workers at every turn and put the blame for the repeated failure of capitalism onto its victims.

    What a pathetic twisted little homunculus, crawling at the feet of your masters, tugging your forelock. ‘Oh aye sirs, I understand it’s for me own good – kick me again.’

  10. Chris said,

    Has Bob Crow apologised for making racist and anti Chinese worker comments in Stratford?

  11. modernity's ghost said,

    ” Instead you support austerity, cuts, neoliberalism, and ‘there is no alternative’ “

    Where did I say that? Middle class fecker. Dear Nanny didn’t teach you to read and think?

    • blerergg ococmementrarayrer said,

      moderRNNTy blererGGGGH iz a suPPORTa of neoliberalsszm. tHIs iz apparerent .

  12. Roger said,

    ‘Do you want the EU to break up?’

    Not really – but I as sure as hell know that the ‘UK Left’ long ago lost the capacity to influence its fate and that there is something ridiculous about our tiny little factionettes talking about a Socialist United States of Europe as if it was still 1973.

    The German bourgeoisie at the centre and the proletariat in the periphery will decide the real future of the EU and we will be impotent bystanders.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 466 other followers

%d bloggers like this: