Tariq Ali on the British labour movement: a study in voluntarism
October 20, 2010 at 11:38 pm (capitalist crisis, Champagne Charlie, Guardian, socialism, unions, workers)
All serious socialists are looking with admiration at the militancy of our French sisters and brothers. And most of us are frustrated with the weakness (to date) of the response of the British unions to the cuts. But Tariq Ali, a commentator who even in his activist days never had much feel for the working class movement, has written a truly bizarre piece for today’s Graun (G2 section); here’s a flavour:
“What a contrast (the French and Greek protests are) with the miserable, measly actions being planned by the lily-livered English trade unions. There is growing anger and bitterness here too, but it is being recuperated by a petrified bureacracy. A ritual protest has been planned, largely to demonstrate that they are doing something. But is this something better than nothing?”
Read it all here.
Leave aside for now the strange use of the word “recuperate” and the genuinely ultra-left suggestion that the British unions’ “ritual protest” (presumably a reference to today’s House of Commons rally) might be worse than doing nothing at all…no, the really noticeable point about this piece is Ali’s suggestion that the union bureacracy is holding back the struggle against the cuts. There is not one iota or shred of evidence to support this contention and if Ali seriously belives it to be true (as opposed to using it as a rhetorical flourish for the delectation of Guardian readers) , then it’s proof of just how out of touch he’s become.
Of course we all know that the role of the union leaders has always been one of betrayal and capitulation and that their record over the past thirty years has been especially craven. But the anti-cuts fight is going to have to be built through patient work, concentrating upon local rank and file committees based on stewards, trades councils and branches. Hopefully, it will also involve local Labour parties. The idea that a call to arms by Brendan Barber (or Tony Woodley or Mark Serwotka) could immediately conjure up direct action of the sort presently being seen in France is crazy voluntarism. It’s also profoundly defeatist because (as Ali notes later in the article) “nothing will happen from above,” yet he proposes no other strategy. OK: this was a short piece for the Guardian and not intended as a programme for action. Even so, it must rank as a grossly irresponsible and unhelpful piece of posturing by a middle class poseur: not even a closing quote from Shelly (Ye are many, they are few) can redeem Ali’s miserable little piece.
Mikey said,
October 21, 2010 at 12:31 am
“We shall fight.
We will win.
Paris,
London,
Rome,
Berlin.”
Slogan chanted outside the French Embassy in London by Tariq Ali and plenty of others: May 25, 1968. These were also the words on the famous front cover of the first issue of the revived Black Dwarf (June 1, 1968)
Judith said,
November 29, 2010 at 11:32 am
Gosh, you’ve got a good memory, thank you for reminding me of our chant: it’s about time we taught it to the new generation who grew up under Blair, poor things. They don’t seem to realise their historical significance, potential power and need to network and look at the broader picture. Maybe they’ll listen to those of us with long memories, certainly those occupying SOAS seemed interested and wanted to hear more.
Mikey said,
November 29, 2010 at 11:35 am
It is not so much that I have a good memory. What I do have is a framed copy of an original that newspaper hanging on my wall!
Steve said,
October 21, 2010 at 8:09 am
“a commentator who even in his activist days never had much feel for the working class movement”
Lies, lies, lies
Is is cos he is an anti Zionist?
“the anti-cuts fight is going to have to be built through patient work”
By which time all the cuts will have been implemented!!
James Bloodworth said,
October 21, 2010 at 11:06 am
Most of the unions have zero interest in any radical change. Tariq is probably correct.
maxdunbar said,
October 21, 2010 at 11:20 am
You also have to factor in that the trade union and working class movement was decimated by Thatcher in the 1980s – it is a fraction of what it was, and facing a government far more extreme than Thatcher
shug said,
October 21, 2010 at 2:39 pm
Wasen!t the eighties a bind for the socialist movements voice,the Trade Unions.Taken over by market orientated for some, unelected officials,as the market rationalised its profit route.Massive lay offs and less factory influence on what the workers dictate.Sold the jobs from under their nose and they buy, what they used to make.
Workers and their unions,didin!t take to long to suck them in,give them property and they are just like the rest.
Clive said,
October 21, 2010 at 2:41 pm
Steve: “the anti-cuts fight is going to have to be built through patient work”. By which time all the cuts will have been implemented!!
So you propose impatient work instead?
Egg on your face said,
October 21, 2010 at 3:40 pm
According to Bob Crow, the TUC General Council rejected the idea of calling a National Anti-Cuts demonstration in November, preferring to wait till next March.
Pinkie said,
October 21, 2010 at 7:47 pm
It seems that this article criticises Tariq Ali for saying things that the author agrees with. The problem being that it was written by Tariq Ali, and not by the invisible AWL.
Sad fuck.
Scratch said,
October 21, 2010 at 7:56 pm
A more militant, progressive workers movement would have strung bourgeois parasites like Ali up decades ago.
Arthur Seaton said,
October 21, 2010 at 11:00 pm
For Christ’s sake. Would it not be better to have a few posts about the best way of launching protests against the biggest onslaught against the working classes since the 20s? A bit of unity? You don’t agree with Ali’s analysis – fine. I like this site and agree with it more often than not……but for the theme of your second post since the spending review to be an attack on Tariq Ali rather than the government…….that’s pretty fucking pathetic to be honest.
Richard Estes said,
October 23, 2010 at 6:23 pm
The hyperbolic criticism aside, the author may well be correct that there is no fount of dissent ready to explode, regardless of what the union hierarchy does. In this sense, Ali may be overly optimistic.
jack haslam said,
October 25, 2010 at 12:40 am
There is a lot of fear out there. the idea of patiently buidling up a fightback. supporting groups of workers that take action against the cuts is a starting point and building solidarity with them is the right approach. Obviously a lead from the official movement naming a day of action would be a start. But the unreality of the approach of people like the SWP (TUC call a general strike!) is simply a measure of how out of touch/ or cynical parts of the left are.
What did Marx say? one genuine struggle is worth a dozen programmes.
sackcloth and ashes said,
October 26, 2010 at 7:57 pm
If Tariq Ali is marching alongside you, you know you’re fucked.
‘We shall fight.
We will win.
Paris,
London,
Rome,
Berlin’.
I wonder if Tariq ever wondered why it was he and his kind could only demonstrate in the Western half of that fourth city in that chant?