I know what I like
There’s a real difference between talent (however tortured)…
…and charlatanry (however lucrative):
Visit this exhibition while you can.
Contact Shiraz Socialist
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Blogroll
- +972
- A Very Public Sociologist
- ACA The Underground
- Aesthetic, Not Anesthetic
- Airforce Amazons
- Alison Kerr's Jazz Blog
- Barholomew's Notes on Religion
- Bastard Logic
- Bob From Brockley
- Broken Barnet
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Byas'd Opinions
- Centre for Secular Space
- Citizen Barnet
- Daniel Hoffman-Gill
- Dave Osler
- Dawg's Blawg
- Fat Man on a Keyboard
- Gouche
- Hangbitch
- Harry’s Place
- Helen Russell
- History Is Made At Night
- Informed Comment
- Inveresk Street Ingrate
- Jacobinism
- Jazz Lives
- Labourstart
- Left Foot Forward
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Max Dunbar
- Mutterings of a Malcontent
- Mystical Politics
- Normblog
- Poumista
- Rasti
- Rationalist Association
- Reality Now
- Red Mike Rowley
- Representing The Mambo
- Rosebell's Blog
- Rosie Bell
- Rupa Huq
- Sam Harris
- Saudi Woman's Weblog
- Shuggy
- Tendance Coatsey
- Terry Glavin
- The Field Negro
- The Samosa
- The Soul of Man Under Capitalism
- The Spittoon
- The Underground
- Though Cowards Flinch
- Too Much To Say For Myself
- UnderstandingSociety
- Walkers In The City
- Watching A4e
- When My Feet Go Through The Door
- Whisky and tea
- Working In These Times
Political groups
publications
Blog Stats
- 1,384,415 hits
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
Theme: Dusk by Beccary. Blog at WordPress.com.
johnathan rook said,
September 27, 2008 at 8:57 pm
Can you elaborate exactly what you mean?
charliethechulo said,
September 28, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Yes; this about sums it up:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2008/09/07/bahirst107.xml
johnathan rook said,
September 28, 2008 at 8:31 pm
Well just because art is mainly collected and admired by the rich, does that mean we can’t admire it too?
Or are you against the subject matter? Are you against art about death, for example, because that is what Hirst’s artwork is about? Rothko’s art is semi-religious and mythical, does that matter higher than Hirst’s works on death?
Or isn’t it because Rothko’s work concentrates on finding a spiritual home separate from class antagonisms and commodification, while Hirst’s art is not political, isn’t that why you hate it so much?