Israel boycott: an extraordinary admission

September 28, 2007 at 1:03 am (Anti-Racism, anti-semitism, Jim D, left, Racism, SWP, unions)

In an extraordinary admission, the (British) Socialist Workers Party, leading champions of the campaign for a boycott of all things Israeli, have acknowleged that, given a free vote, rank and file union members would reject a boycott.

The SWP’s supple-spined intellektshul-for-hire Alex Callinicos, says:

The left faces two problems here (with regard to a membership ballot in UCU -JD). The first is that the boycott is an issue that divides critics of Israel. Even as sterling an anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist as Noam Chomsky opposes it.

The second is that any ballot would be dominated by a well-funded Zionist campaign that would enjoy the overwhelming support of the mass media….

”…The left should refuse to walk into Hunt’s (Sally Hunt, Gen Sec of the UCU – JD) trap. We should make it clear now that we do not intend to propose an actual boycott of any Israeli academic institutions at the next union congress”.

A few straightforward questions to “Comrade” Callinicos;

1/ If even “as sterling an anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist as Noam Chomsky”  opposes the boycott, how come your organisation and its friends have spent the last decade denouncing opponents of the boycott as “well-funded Zionists”, “pro-imperialists” and various other varieties of foul reactionary?

2/ If you fear losing a membership ballot in UCU, then what has happened to your organisation’s much-vaunted tradition of championing “rank-and-file” democracy within the trade union movement?

3/ If, as you say, comrade, “We should make it clear now that we do not intend to propose an actual boycott of any Israeli academic institutions at the next union congress”, then we who oppose the boycott have a right to ask you: is that self-denying ordinance simply because you’ve calculated that you’ll lose? If so, we presume that your intention is to come back later, once you’ve calculated that you’ll win. So much for the SWP’s and Mr Hickey’s disingenous protestations of ‘we only want a debate': what they mean is, “we only want a debate that we can win”.

4/ Do you, on mature consideration,  stand by your claim that “…any ballot would be dominated by a well-funded Zionist campaign that would enjoy the overwhelming support of the mass media”? 

 The forces that defeated the previous boycott policy within the old AUT (now part of the UCU), were “Engage” and the Alliance for Workers Liberty: are you suggestiong that either of them are “well-funded Zionist” campiagns, with the “overwhelming support of the media”? You should know that by recycling such utter bollocks, you are recycling anti-semitic stereotypes, and the “socialism of fools”.

Shame on you, Callinicos!

But at least we now have, in writing, your admission that your anti-Israeli “boycott” campaign does not have the support of the likes of Noam Chomsky, nor of most rank and file trade unionists in Britain…and that you fear the result of a rank-and-file ballot…and have had to resort to anti-semitic conspiracy theories in order to defend your position.

6 Comments

  1. modernityblog said,

    Jim,

    you hit the nail on the head with this comment:

    “is that self-denying ordinance simply because you’ve calculated that you’ll lose?”

    isn’t it strange that they never made such an assessment before they embarked on this nasty divisive campaign against Israel?

    you would think that with all their political experience they might have been able to do that?

    pathetic

  2. voltaires_priest said,

    Conspiracy theories is exactly right… Callinicos has calculated they’ll lose, apparently because the Jooos who run the media will scupper the brave SWP truth-tellers. If this bollocks wasn’t so vile, it’d be funny.

  3. Simon B said,

    Volty,

    I think you mean the Zionists run the media. To suggest that they mean Jews is a disgraceful smear etc. etc. etc.

    They are all impecable anti racists and used to organise rock festivals against racism etc.etc.etc.

  4. voltaires_priest said,

    Usually with Gilad Atzmon headlining…

  5. tim said,

    anyone who likes blood sports should have a look at JohnG being dismembered by David Hirsh here

    http://hurryupharry.bloghouse.net/cgi-bin/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=7314

  6. charliethechulo said,

    It’s a great pity that Sally Hunt and tye UCU leadership have rules tyhe debate on the boycott out of order on legsl grounds: it gives the pro-boycott people the excuse they need and love, to whinge on about being “silenced” by the all-powerful “zionist” forces that they believe control the media and everything…whereas, had a ballot of the membership taken place, the anti-semites would have been smashed once and for all (as Alex callinicos recognised)…now they can whinge on about Jewish -sorry – “Zionist” conspiracies, that denied them victory.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 504 other followers

%d bloggers like this: